<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="/stylesheets/rss.css"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/">
  <channel>
    <title>The BFC Computing Weblog: NH Broadband Action Plan</title>
    <link>http://blog.bfccomputing.com/articles/2008/09/02/nh-broadband-action-plan</link>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <ttl>40</ttl>
    <description>My God, It's Full of Source!</description>
    <item>
      <title>NH Broadband Action Plan</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;DRED has published its &amp;#8217;&lt;a href="http://www.nheconomy.com/broadband-action-plan.aspx"&gt;Broadband Action Plan&lt;/a&gt;&amp;#8217; with recommendations on how to improve the penetration of high speed Internet service in NH.  I attended a session in Plymouth last year to provide input on the plan.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Overall it&amp;#8217;s a good report.  I&amp;#8217;m especially impressed with its recommendations to get State out of the way for access to land and towers, permitting, etc.  Also, predictable, uniform, and competitive access to utility poles is a very important issue.  They recommend the &lt;a href="http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/legislation/2008/SB0412.html"&gt;creation&lt;/a&gt; of a government office to oversee this work, but don&amp;#8217;t set a recommendation for when that would would be finished.  It may be necessary but this issue ought not be used to grow government in a permanent manner.  This kind of communications infrastructure has the potential to really streamline government, so it&amp;#8217;s probably a net-win to have the office.  They&amp;#8217;re asking for $100,000 for each of the next two years to fund the office, so it&amp;#8217;s necessarily limited as currently proposed.  A citizen of NH might expect to pay a dollar over the next few years to fund it.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#8217;ve noticed that Burlington Telecomm has been having revenue shortfalls and the ECFiberNet project, which I had high hopes for, has apparently &lt;a href="http://telephonyonline.com/broadband/commentary/telecom_changing_times/"&gt;abandoned&lt;/a&gt; the core attribute that made it exciting - that it would be self-funded, and has gone asking for bond money instead.  That was always the uncreative option, but the private model made ECFiberNet free of coercion.  That is to say, government-run models don&amp;#8217;t appear to be very healthy, but where the government can act to get out of industry&amp;#8217;s way or improve its monopoly grants we should welcome its action.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 08:57:00 -0400</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">urn:uuid:7d88c5ab-4e52-4b30-a779-5052ad514e31</guid>
      <author>Bill McGonigle</author>
      <link>http://blog.bfccomputing.com/articles/2008/09/02/nh-broadband-action-plan</link>
      <category>Wireless</category>
      <category>Energy</category>
      <category>Business</category>
      <category>Politics</category>
      <category>Internet</category>
      <category>Telecommunications</category>
      <category>Local</category>
      <trackback:ping>http://blog.bfccomputing.com/articles/trackback/4781</trackback:ping>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>"NH Broadband Action Plan" by christopher mitchell</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;BT having revenue shortfalls?  I don't think that is an accurate description.  I've spoken with folks from Burlington, and they are doing well.  These projects take many years to break even and BT is near that.  &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;As for ECFibernet, I'm fairly certain the plan was always to get funding via a capital lease - this is what Nulty knows best and how he intended to approach.  Getting some money from Vermont was something they wanted just to show support from the state to get a better interest rate from private investors.  The investors will be repaid with revenues from subscribers - so the network is self-funded in the long term.  &lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 17:58:03 -0400</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">urn:uuid:89f3d98c-66c5-4beb-ad1b-a442c5f96724</guid>
      <link>http://blog.bfccomputing.com/articles/2008/09/02/nh-broadband-action-plan#comment-30526</link>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
